|
|
SCHEDULE
1 |
DELAY |
|
|
|
(days) |
|
17/11/10 |
I sent an email to Devon PCT asking for all information to which I was entitled under the Data Protection Act. |
* |
|
17/11/10 |
The PCT emailed an acknowledgement asking for clarification |
|
|
17/11/10 |
I clarified what they should provide |
|
|
1/1/11 |
Letter from PCT and copies of data containing administrative (eg pension and superannuation papers), Correspondence with my solicitor (Beachcrofts) appointed by the MDU – all of which I was familiar with, Correspondence with NCAS GMC, some internal emails, etc |
45 |
|
21/1/11 |
I emailed the PCT a list of many missing documents. |
* |
|
21/1/11 |
Email from PCT deferring response until 10/2/11 |
|
|
14/2/11 |
I emailed the PCT asking for their promised response |
|
|
3/3/11 |
Letter from Ann James PCT enclosing one further data item relating to contract, and 12 of the documents previously not disclosed. One item, the transcript of Dr Bower’s hearing was “not disclosable”, the rest were “not held”. Further data may be available from their solicitors |
|
|
5/3/11 |
I wrote and emailed a further reminder with 14 day deadline |
|
|
28/2/11 |
PCT apologise for delay |
|
|
8/3/11 |
PCT email asking acknowledgement of receipt of Bundle B |
|
|
10/3/11 |
My acknowledgment and request for further data from solicitors when available |
|
|
17/3/11 |
Stimson addendum including Transcript of 3rd Hearing Transcript 4th Hearing |
55 |
|
1/4/11 |
Letter requesting undisclosed data and a) Personal data in transcript of Dr Bower hearing suitably redacted b) my data in minutes of panel meeting about me on 18/9/09 c) personal data in joint LMC/PCT performance meetings. |
* |
|
6/5/11 |
PCT apology for delay re my letter of 1 April 2011 |
|
|
9/5/11 |
Email pursuing one point and asking about “final reflection” with enclosure |
|
|
17/5/11 |
Further email reminder |
|
|
27/5/11 |
Letter from PCT’s solicitor, including: original complaint against me now located. Seeking consent of author. Transcript of Dr Bower hearing still deemed not disclosable. “Final reflection” has not occurred. Some Press releases about me disclosed |
|
|
31/5/11 |
Email, expressing my disappointment at delay |
|
|
31/5/11 |
BB stalling email |
|
|
14/6/11 |
PCT stalling email |
|
|
20/6/11 |
Bevan Brittan reply |
|
|
21/6/11 |
Email re delay, crossed with BB response of 20/6/11 |
|
|
18/7/11 |
Email to PCT and Devon LMC as each said that the other was Data Holder for Minutes of their joint meetings. |
|
|
3/8/11 |
Email response from PCT |
124 |
|
22/8/11 |
E-mail RES to BB asking for details relating to their newly released information about an independent internal review of their handling of this case by Sir John Oldham |
* |
|
26/8/11 |
BB acknowledge Oldham request |
|
|
6/9/11 |
E-mail RES to BB chasing up reply to RES e-mail of 22.8.11 |
|
|
6/9/11 |
BB awaiting response from PCT |
|
|
7/9/11 |
BB enclose terms of ref for Oldham –“not pursued” |
16 |
|
10/9/11 |
E-mail RES to BB detailing further missing data (16) |
* |
|
23/9/11 |
Email from RES chasing response to one of 10/9/11 |
|
|
30/9/11 |
Email from RES chasing response to one of 10/9/11 |
|
|
19/10/11 |
Email from RES chasing response to one of 10/9/11 |
|
|
9/11/11 |
Trust’s point by point response from BB |
60 |
|
12/11/11 |
Further chasing e-mail RES to BB |
* |
|
16/11/11 |
apology from BB and explaining no data on screening panel |
4 |
|
16/11/11 |
E-mail RES to BB specifically about screening panel minutes. |
* |
|
27/11/11 |
E-mail RES to PCT requesting further details |
|
|
5/12/11 |
Email RES to BB chasing response top 2 previous emails |
|
|
5/12/11 |
BB say they have “no further instructions” from PCT |
|
|
12/12/11 |
E-mail RES to PCT further chasing as BB say they have “no further instructions” |
|
|
14/12/11 |
E-mail RES to PCT further chasing response to my request |
|
|
16/12/11 |
email PCT will search for records very soon |
|
|
16/12/11 |
PCT give contact details of ”Audit Southwest” |
|
|
16/12/11 |
Emailed SAR request to Audit Southwest |
|
|
23/12/11 |
email Audit Southwest saying they are not data controller, PCT is |
|
|
23/12/11 |
E-mail RES to PCT asking for them to sort out who is data controller |
|
|
30/12/11 |
PCT acknowledgement of above, 40 days… |
|
|
9/1/12 |
E-mail Res to PCT requesting inappropriate 40 day rule local counter-fraud personal data (previously said not data controller) |
|
|
18/1/12 |
PCT responding to 12, 16 Nov + 12 Dec 11 |
|
|
24/1/12 |
Email from BB re “lack of clarity and some attached info |
|
|
8/2/12 |
PCT additional response containing hearing transcript previously disclosed. |
84 |
|
31/5/12 |
Letter from Information commissioner saying that transcript of Dr Bower’s hearing had been destroyed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total delay from first DPA request (17.11.10) = 18 months Total delay from first request for enquiry (10.8.09) = 33 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KEY: * = date from which each separate period of delay is measured Different colours denote separate periods of delay |
|